Waitlist openThe oracle deck is coming. Join the waitlist for first access and updates.Join the waitlist →
For organisations · Leverage: goals, rules and incentives

The Coherence Framework

Where an organisation is coherent with what it says it values, where it’s drifting, and where distortion has set in.

The thesis

State, story and structure

Coherence is how closely state, story and structure line up, from one person out to the institutions around them. Wholeness is nothing essential abandoned to stay acceptable to a system. Integrity is the movement back towards it.

COHERENCE WITH INTEGRITY STATEPersonal: inner capacity and regulationSTORYRelational: patterns of power and meaningSTRUCTUREInstitutional: governance and incentives INTEGRITYTHE MOVEMENT BACK Wholeness THE NORTH STAR STATEPersonal: inner capacity and regulationSTORYRelational: patterns of power and meaningSTRUCTUREInstitutional: governance and incentives COHERENCE WITH INTEGRITYACROSS ALL THREE INTEGRITY WholenessTHE NORTH STAR
Three layers

Every layer has to hold

A system can look healthy at one layer and be failing at another. Most change efforts work on one layer and wonder why nothing shifts.

State · Personal

Inner capacity and regulation

The nervous system capacity of the people inside a system, and especially of those leading it. Without regulation, even well designed structures produce outcomes that contradict their stated values.

Story · Relational

Patterns of power and meaning

Where values either live in practice or stay decorative. Whether power is named openly or hidden in plain sight, and whose knowledge gets to count.

Structure · Institutional

Governance and incentives

What an organisation actually rewards, whatever it says it values. Incentives are behaviour architecture, and governance is where values get encoded or quietly dropped.

A fourth part of the framework looks at the boundaries between the layers: how well each one translates into the next, and where the translation breaks down.

How it goes wrong

Alignment, drift and distortion

Misalignment rarely arrives all at once. Drift is gradual erosion. Distortion is when a specific harm has corrupted the signal. They need different responses.

AlignmentDriftDistortion
State → StoryAlignmentInternal regulation supports relational safety.DriftStress erodes trust. Values begin to lose their force.DistortionFear drives narrative manipulation.
Story → StructureAlignmentRelational norms are encoded in governance.DriftValues are spoken but not structurally rewarded.DistortionPower protects itself institutionally, and harm becomes reinforced.
Why integrity, not just coherence

A system can be coherent and still exploitative. A system with integrity can’t sustain exploitation, because its incentives would contradict its values.

Operating principles

What the framework assumes

Principle

Regulation precedes transformation

A dysregulated system can’t hold the conversations that change requires.

Principle

Story precedes strategy

A strategy built on a story nobody believes will be quietly worked around.

Principle

Meaning precedes mechanism

Tools and processes only work once people know what they’re for.

Principle

Place precedes redesign

Change has to start from where a system actually is, not where its plans say it is.

Principle

Wisdom tempers growth

Growth that outpaces a system’s capacity is how the people inside it get used up.

Principle

Scale amplifies what’s already there

Coherence and incoherence both get bigger as a system grows.

Register interest

Bring it into your organisation

The framework grew out of my study and my systems leadership practice, and it’s still in development. I’m looking for a small number of purpose-driven organisations to work with as it takes shape.

This opens an email to me with your details filled in.